Rollback LabCHET LONG · TECHNICAL EDITIONStory edition ↗
HUMAN SOVEREIGNTY / EXPLORATORY MODEL

The margin for
human control.

Test whether a rollback package holds below a fixed frontier reference, or leaves a route back to recursive capability growth.

THE QUESTION

Can retained technology stay below the point where it regenerates what we intended to prevent?

Inspect the model
ASSUMPTION-DRIVEN

Evidence supports the pathways. All slider values, coefficients and thresholds are explicit scenario assumptions. Reconstruction results test resource separation. Human-outcome percentages below use the same conditional-risk model as the story edition.

SIMULATED TRAJECTORY

Recoverable capability

Index · frontier reference = 100
Central assumptions 27-case stress envelope Reference threshold

RECONSTRUCTION ROUTES

The weakest barrier matters.

Each route is tested against the strongest modeled actor. Below 1× means the required reserve is missing; below 1/M means resources meet the assumed reconstruction cost.

THE SAME SCENARIO, IN HUMAN TERMS

Human outcomes

See this exact scenario in the story ↗
Conditional risks and stopping assumptions

These rates are per consequential transition. Reconstruction cycles and transitions are separate units. The 27 stress cases are not a probability distribution.

02 / COMPARE & CHALLENGE

Find where the conclusion changes.

Compare packages, change two controls at once, and see which assumptions matter most.

TWO-CONTROL SWEEP

Stability landscape

121 packages
Candidate stable Sensitive Regenerates Above enforcement ceiling

Every cell includes all 27 stress cases. Select a cell to apply its controls. Other inputs stay fixed.

ONE CONTROL AT A TIME

What moves the margin?

±10% of range

Changes in the worst resource margin, holding every other input fixed. A wider span means greater local sensitivity.

Shown as log₂ change from the current margin. Controls are clipped at their endpoints. This ranking does not capture every interaction.

03 / EVIDENCE & ASSUMPTIONS

An inspectable argument.

Mechanisms grounded in sources. Numerical judgments left open to challenge.

Sources checked
17 September 2026
MODEL SPECIFICATION · V1.0.0Equations, assumptions & limits+

Built from Chet Long’s rollback framework

“A technological plateau for human sovereignty,” updated 13 September 2026. The model carries forward route-specific reconstruction margins, retained substrate, human technical authorship and an enforcement ceiling. It does not model essential-service continuity, political rights or transition harms as interchangeable scores.